[Alpacasite] Re: judges clinic

I don't think anything needs to be hidden from newer people. If one
was so inclined to look for something to bring up from the past that
would be controversial, it could be found. I find it interesting
information, but there was such a negative spin on how it was
presented that people immediately got defensive. The useful
information gets completely lost in the bickering.

I'm glad there were consequences for their actions, but it seems that
they "did their time" and have hopefully learned from it. Perhaps
getting recertified is a positive thing and they are moving forward.
Seems like a good thing.

Angie Gray
Starlight Alpacas
Eugene, Oregon

--- In Alpacasite@yahoogroups.com, "Margie Korshoj" <mkorshoj@c...> wrote:
>
> Libby and Jan,
>
> the info that Mary and Anthony are attending a judge's
recertification clinic is important for what reason? If they have met
the requirements of the sanctions for that incident AND they are known
to be very good judges, what is this about? People make mistakes,
generally pay for them somehow and move forward. Frankly I have never
heard anything but good things about their judging. Getting
re-certified is a " positive" step, not a negative one. This would be
a 'fact' of note if they were the ONLY attendees as a personal favor;
but otherwise I think it falls more in the cry wolf, or the sky is
falling message. Just my personal take on it. Re-certification is a
definite positive.
>
> I have a suggestion though that might help. For those that like to
hear the re-hash over and over or those new and don't have a clue what
this is all about..Ken could establish a website for information that
he can list on his signature line. That way we can access his volumes
of herd management, fiber information which I highly value; as well as
his litany of mis-deeds past and present committed by alpaca folks,
along with the intense condemnations be they right or wrong.
>
> This would save so much time for everyone and keep things civil when
it is of a political nature since he doesn't want to join
alpacapolitics to do this rehash of misdeeds or disagreements.
>
> And Tim, just read your post. Afraid for the information to be
known by new people? I would have to say a polite nuts to that
thought! Just prefer positives, moving forward, and balance. Moving a
nasty discussion to politics site is not curtailing information. It
isn't moved unless it is a dead horse being dug up again or gets very
personally nasty.
>
> My .02
>
> Margie
>
>
> Margie Korshoj
> mkorshoj@c...
> 10313 SW 87th Ave.
> Tigard, OR 97223
> 503-412-8689
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Help tsunami villages rebuild at GlobalGiving. The real work starts now.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/T42rFC/KbOLAA/cosFAA/jO1qlB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->

Opinions and postings on this list are the sole responsibility of the person posting the message. The accuracy and content of each message in no way reflect the opinions of the administrator or Yahoo.

List administrator - Rick Horn - All American Alpacas alpacas@alpacaweb.com
http://aaalpacas.com

TO CHANGE OPTIONS visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Alpacasite/join
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Alpacasite/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Alpacasite-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/