Re: [AlpacaTalk] fertility questions
Hi Allison,
Hi Heather,
Given the language of your contract, you plainly have the remedy of requesting a replacement animal. Given that no specific time period has been specified for the determination of what would be a reasonable time to prove either fertility or infertility, then a reasonable time is implied by law. In this case a reasonable time would be long enough to become pregnant and carry a cria to term. Reasonable proof of infertility would be a repro exam coupled with attempts to settle the animal with a proven male who has produced progeny. Since who bears costs has not been specified, you might suggest that they be split…or that you bear costs of breeding and they bear costs of repro exam before replacement clause kicks in.
Additionally, although you have express warranties, all of the normal "implied" warranties would exist as well. Plus, you have the express warranties as stated and construed by law of your locality.
Your girl has not settled, you have given her time. Have you notified the seller of your predicament? Also, have you given them a chance to have the girl's status reviewed by their vet at their expense? Both of those would be reasonable moves in this situation.
As usual, I give the following caveat. I'm a retired attorney who was licensed in California. I'm not practicing law or giving legal advice, just general information which may be of use. You should consult with an attorney licensed in your area if you believe that legal action may be necessary.
In these situations, I believe that early communication and dialog is really necessary….and the earlier the better!
Best of luck with these frustrating events…hope your girl finally settles.
Allison
Allison E. Moss-Fritch
New Moon Alpacas
350 Cloquallum Rd.
Elma, WA 98541
360 861-8584
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home