[AlpacaTalk] Re: Agistment Contract Question
Thanks. I will certainly give these comments some thought. I think at the very least, title should be transferred on a fully paid animal.
--- In AlpacaTalk@yahoogro
>
>
>
> I would agree. While I have not read the sale or agistment contracts you mention, I certainly have questions about the ethics of the actions you describe. Might I also recommend speaking with ARI about this situation?
>
>
>
> Best,
>
>
>
> Denise L. Moss-Fritch
>
> New Moon Alpacas
>
> Santa Clara, CA
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Heather Zeleny" <alpacatalk@
> To: AlpacaTalk@yahoogro
> Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2009 10:15:49 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
> Subject: Re: [AlpacaTalk] Re: Agistment Contract Question
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> All I can think is that I'd find another farm to do business with.
> And buy from.
>
> Heather
>
> On Jun 2, 2009, at 10:08 AM, greenfleece60 wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Allison,
> >
> > Thanks. I appreciate your comments. The state is NJ. In reading the
> > contract over again, I also have noted that when animals are sold
> > by this farm the title does not transfer until they are delivered.
> > If the animals board, even if they are fully paid off, the farm
> > retains the title and places proceeds from any sales into a trust
> > account from which boarding fees are drawn.
> >
> > I don't know if it is common for title to be held by the seller in
> > the case of paid off but still boarded animals. It seems like it
> > would be unusual.
> >
> > Kathy Quinn
> > Clifton Heights, PA
> .
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
posted by Chaddo at 11:42 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home