RE: [AlpacaTalk] for Libby
Hello again,
Once again, Libby's submission is something which the law bound her to do. It does not constitute a breach of the agreement which can have no force which contravenes otherwise valid law. In this case the valid laws which are limiting the reach of the agreement are the laws on discovery in another court case. Her attorney in receiving the material which answered the discovery request also breached neither the agreement nor the law. That attorney was bound by the laws of discovery to disclose it if it was arguably within the reach of the discovery request. Any "fuzzy" material would be subject to a ruling by the Judge as to whether it was relevant…the Judge has a right and a duty to see all the information that MIGHT respond to the request…and the JUDGE alone has the duty/right to determine what will be used as a final, formal response to the discovery request.
So both Libby and her counsel were bound to disclose and submit the information. That a Judge later determined that it was not relevant did not make the response an unwarranted disclosure.
This is a Court of Law situation and very few of you have either the background or the experience to judge what happens there with any true understanding of whether or not Libby's actions were correct. I do have that knowledge and I am certain that she did nothing incorrectly. You are not in a position to judge this matter competently and therefore should not do so.
Best Regards,
Allison E. Moss-Fritch
New Moon Alpacas
Santa Clara, CA
408/248-3581
http://www.newmoona
From: AlpacaTalk@yahoogro
Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2008 9:53 AM
To: AlpacaTalk@yahoogro
Subject: RE: [AlpacaTalk] for Libby
Libby,
From what I have read of those court documents, you
did submit that confidentiality agreement to your
attorney, which breached the agreement, then submitted
that info to the court. The court threw it out saying
that it was not relevant to the LOL suit. So, what is
incorrect? Last time, you said that Dr. Stachowski
submitted that agreement himself. Completely false.
Contacting you privately would only allow for
misinformation regarding the truth, unfortunately.
Stephanie
Stardust Alpacas
--- libby@alpacafarm.
>
>
>
>
> To all,
>
> There is incorrect information below. If anyone has
> any questions or
> concerns, feel free to contact me.
>
> Thanks, Libby
>
> Libby Forstner
> Magical Farms
> 330-722-4820
> libby@alpacafarm.
>
>
>
>
>
> "Floyd Romanik"
>
> <floyd@indiansumm
>
> eralpacas.com>
> To
> Sent by:
> <AlpacaTalk@yahoogro
> AlpacaTalk@yahoog
> cc
> roups.com
>
>
> Subject
> RE:
> [AlpacaTalk] for Libby
> 02/23/2008 11:11
>
> AM
>
>
>
>
>
> Please respond to
>
> AlpacaTalk@yahoog
>
> roups.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dick,
>
> I guess I’m unsure if you’re trying to support
> Libby or insult her. I’m
> referring to your quote from Hubbard. "The purpose
> of a law suit is to
> harass and discourage rather than win. The law can
> be used very easily to
> harass, and enough harassment on somebody will
> generally be sufficient to
> cause professional decease. If possible, of course,
> ruin him utterly. "
>
> Seriously, Libby was just doing what she felt was
> right when she signed on
> to the Intervener filing against AOBA and appeal,
> when she as ARI President
> filed suit against Mary Reed and of course when she
> filed suit against Land
> O Lakes in Federal court and again when not
> satisfied through the state
> district courts. Unfortunately, she was not correct
> when she violated the
> confidentiality agreement she signed as ARI
> President.
>
> So are you supporting Libby or insulting her? Or are
> you maybe trying to
> justify some kind of double standard where some are
> allowed to bring
> lawsuits and others are not as you seem to believe
> they’re initiated to
> simply “harass�
>
> Sincerely,
> Ana
>
> Floyd and Ana Romanik
> Indian Summer Alpacas
> Chepachet, Rhode Island
> Phone: (401) 568-7759
>
> ____________
> From: AlpacaTalk@yahoogro
> [mailto:AlpacaTalk@yahoogro
> Behalf Of Dick McCoy
> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 10:20 PM
> To: AlpacaTalk@yahoogro
> Subject: Re: [AlpacaTalk] for Libby
>
> Libby,
>
> You are wrong about owing property on the moon. If
> you insist on claiming
> moon ownership I will be forced to sue you. I
> personally purchased the moon
> including all mineral rights from a guy in 42nd.
> Street last week. I will
> email you a copy of the deed if you wish.
>
> I am not at all annoyed, envious or bitter about the
> other properties and
> business you own, In fact, I pity those obsessed
> with useless envy. I only
> object to your claim on my moon.
>
> Please do not take my threat to sue lightly.
> Remember the quote from
> Hubbard.
>
> "The purpose of a law suit is to harass and
> discourage rather than win.
>
> The law can be used very easily to harass, and
> enough harassment on
>
> somebody will generally be sufficient to cause
> professional decease.
>
> If possible, of course, ruin him utterly. "
>
> You have been warned.
>
> Best personal regards.
>
> Dick McCoy
> Foxrun Farms Alpacas
> Cato, NY 13033
> MyMoon@alpacafarms.
> (315) 626-2672
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: libby@alpacafarm.
> To: AlpacaTalk@yahoogro
> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 1:49 PM
> Subject: Re: [AlpacaTalk] for Libby
>
> Hello all,
>
> You left out my property on the moon.
>
> If any of you have real questions that you would
> like an answer to, I'll be
> glad to answer. My phone number is 330-722-4820 or
> you can email me at
> libby@alpacafarm.
>
> Best wishes, Stephanie.
>
> Libby
>
> Libby Forstner
> Magical Farms
>
> Stardust Alpacas
> <stardustalpacas@
> yahoo.com> To
> Sent by: alpacatalk@yahoogro
> AlpacaTalk@yahoog cc
> roups.com
> Subject
> [AlpacaTalk] for Libby
> 02/20/2008 01:39
> PM
>
> Please respond to
> AlpacaTalk@yahoog
> roups.com
>
> Libby,
>
> Why do you continue to ask Heather if she is funding
> the lawsuit? Surely you know the answer to that. It
> seems that you are just stirring up your own
> cauldron
> and have literally nothing to work with, so you are
> trying to invent something.
>
> Besides, you have been asked quite a few questions
> that you are avoiding at all costs. Try to answer
> some
> of them for us, please.
>
=== message truncated ===
____________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
posted by Chaddo at 10:22 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home